Locke Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Locke - Essay ExampleWithout getting consent from the original averer, at this point, no one dirty dog possess the resources (Locke 35). Accordingly, all singulars essential labor to acquire office. In addition, the property must personally put on the individual for it to be considered individual property. Labor that the individual cornerstonenot use can be traded in for money, which can later be re-traded for property. Locke contrasts gaining of possession through reachs both natural and unnatural. The major difference between the twain processes is whether the property that one sought for avouchership had a previous owner or still fix within the common ownership domain. People who want to acquire property that already belongs to other individuals do not apply labor to own the property (Locke 40). Instead, they are out to own what someone else has already applied his/her labor to with nothing, such as money, in return. While it can be argued that any individual taking own ership of anything should first seek out others to ask their permission if the community owned it, Locke deemed this start impractical. He compares it to requiring permission from everyone in sight before eating an apple one has found locomote by the roadside (Locke 41). Similarly, if an individual takes ownership of property and leaves more of the same for other people to own and enjoy, no property usurpation can be claimed to have gone on. This should be considered as an action of natural occurrence. However, Locke does caution on how natural private property can be, arguing that the individual should besides take as much as is indispensable for personal and family enjoyment (Locke 45). In addition, the property must be only enough for enjoyment without it going bad in the process. For instance, it is not natural in his view to hoard what can perish. While this is true, it is not unnatural for an individual to own or arrive at more than is enough for personal consumption if t he excess is further traded for the purpose of attaining what one does not own or produce. Since labor endows private property with its naturalness, an individual cannot claim property simply for owning it. The individual is required to labor on the land. Therefore, any individual can lose ownership of their property if there is no application of labor (Locke 46). This is because, in that state, the property is not of benefit to them or anyone else. From a cursory culture of Locke, one could assume that he proposes that it is right for a person to put up boundaries on field of study parks and apply labor to it, allowing the property to become his/her private property. However, deeper reading counters this interpretation by viewing that, at this point, there is there is an overlap of divine law and hu gay law. While nature allows man to use earth as he sees best for convenience and self-sustenance, man is not necessarily the determinative of how individuals depart use the land (L ocke 50). For this reason, people come together to create social bodies and jurisdictions such as towns and villages, which determine the best way to benefit collectively from the resources. Sometimes, these jurisdictions may determine that some land will be left out of individual hands and be in common ownership. Attempting to own the property individually would cause a decrease in its usefulness to the community that possesses the land together.