Female Circumcision Reader Response

Conn 1 Jennifer Conn Professor Michael Hickman GWRTC 103 Sect. 61 15 April 2013 Reader Response 3 though Meyerhardt states that the spring narrative on female circumcision seemed Amusing, I personally found it faraway more disturbing. I was actually shocked and disgusted while interpret this piece, as I am sure my classmates were as come up. The small opening left for urination and menstruation . . . held open by a private piece of straw which is left there during the healing process (1) forced me to feel that is an unbelievably unnatural, dehumanizing practice. I was extremely curious about what ethnical beliefs supported this practice.When coming to the supposed health reasons and seeing how flawed and unfaithful they all were, I was ineffective to keep an open mind or continue trying to understand this practice. The idea of expression at each(prenominal) others genitals to see who had the smallest opening (2) struck me in a large way. This function that is done for so ciety, for a future husband, and for acceptance, seems to light upon away from the woman. It is as if her body does not truly belong to her. I thought it was interesting and important for the spring to include the effect of cultural relativism on the reader.I know that my lack of experience and understanding of the topic, as well as the way of life influences my opinion towards the procedure. Throughout the piece, I was unable change my perception of female circumcision as horrid. Though she seemed to go choke off and forth in the second half of the essay, the author seemed to have prepossess as well. I could see the vague connection to culture overlooking a womans view and treatment of her body. In this way, the procedure seems similar to eating disorders in America. In fact, eating disorders come across as far more deadly.However, I feel that the connection was indistinct and overdramatized especially when the author stated, in America, being fat and ugly, for some, is a wad worse than death(3). If this was true, and our culture was as consistent with our beliefs, then we would not have obesity rates as high as they atomic number 18 today. The statement that plastic mathematical process in America by expert professionals causes as much pain as midwives using whatever is lying almost a razor, a knife, a broken bottle (3) is absurd. Safe, comfortable, controlled cosmetic surgery is not widespread, made by someones own will, and often looked down upon.The fact that eating disorders are not accepted in our society destroys this analogy to female circumcision. Another poor analogy essay by Meyerhardt can be found in the beginning of the piece. The author connects children no longer making funny faces due to slight unfounded fear to the cutting off of female genitalia. Though the thought of looking odd and malformed scared us enough to stop in both circumstances, the examples are extremely different. Funny faces are not natural, and brusque is req uired to stop making them. Possessing female genitalia is natural however, and the remotion of it is dangerous.This analogy downplays the extremity of female circumcision, and does not work. This piece was interesting, and informative on a topic I had known nothing about. For many reasons, it was my whim to reject the idea of female circumcision and find it horrifying. There seemed to be no truly justified reasoning for why it is still happening, aside from traditional. Though the author attempted to describe opposing views, I found them very weak and confusing. I was unable to connect this procedure with concepts in American life, or accept the vague, unrealistic, positive ending that the author provided.